Arpine Jraghatspanyan

Under the research project “Electronic Trade. Possible Risks, Losses and Development Opportunities” fulfilled at ASUE’s AMBERD Research Centre, S. Aghajanyan has participated at the international conference “Development trends of the transport and logistics complex in the context of digital transformation” (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) and presented an article titled “Logistic infrastructure of e-commerce in Armenia”. The conference […]

The “New Silk Road”, or China’s Belt and Road (BRI) project, is set to pass through Hungary. What does this mean for the Central and Eastern European region? Where does it stand now, and how successful is it? What are the risks for us? We talked to Dr. Tamás Matura, China expert and lecturer at

Young Central Asia. Study on the Feasibility of a Youth Policy Dimension in EU-Central Asia Relations The EU’s Central Asia policy is competing with Russia and China for influence in the five states of the Central Asian region. As the EU is neither likely to match the volume of Chinese funds earmarked for infrastructural investments under the

Policy Recommendations on How to Establish a Youth Policy Dimension in EU-Central Asia Relations In a new Policy Paper on Eastern Europe and Central Asia published by the Institut fuer Europaeische Politik, Berlin, Julian Plottka, who is member of the EUCON Jean Monnet Network, and Anton Bewerunge reason that youth policy for the Central Asian region should become

The 3 Seas Initiative: A European answer to China’s Belt and Road? – A quest to modernise delapidated infrastructure in Central Europe has transformed into a geopolitical contest David Morris of EUCON, based at Corvinus University of Budapest, writes: A new infrastructure connectivity initiative in Central Europe is the latest stage for a geopolitical contest.

The Belt and Road Initiative: Good for China only? The Belt and Road Initiative is a huge Chinese foreign policy concept to integrate the economic areas of Asia, Europe and Africa. This article by Johannes Leitner and Hannes Meissner (UAS BFI Vienna) analyses the initiative’s potential and impulses in the post-Soviet space. It was published